TexasBitcoin
Guilty pleaEastern Texas

Two Texas Women Plead Guilty to Conspiracy Charges in Transnational Elder Fraud Scheme

Aug 7, 2020 · Sourced to the U.S. Department of Justice

This case reached the guilty plea stage in the Department of Justice's public record. Everything below reflects only what the government itself announced, and links to the original release.

Pamela Sue Hannan, 67, of Sherman, Texas, and Pamela Sue Jennings, 68, of Houston, Texas, pleaded guilty to conspiring with foreign co-conspirators to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business on August 6, 2020 before U.S. Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell.

Announced

Aug 7, 2020

Status

Guilty plea

Defendants

  • Pamela Sue Hannanage 67 · Sherman, Texas · pleaded guilty
  • Pamela Sue Jenningsage 68 · Houston, Texas · pleaded guilty

Charges

  • Conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business

    Max: 5 years in federal prisonPamela Sue Hannan· pleaded guilty

  • Conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business

    Max: 5 years in federal prisonPamela Sue Jennings· pleaded guilty

Financial actions

  • seizure: $880,000Funds received from romance scam victims and other fraudulent schemes, transferred to foreign co-conspirators' bank accounts

Investigating agencies

U.S. Department of Homeland Security-Homeland Security InvestigationsU.S. Postal Inspection ServiceSherman Police DepartmentAppleton Police DepartmentU.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Texas

Case details

Prosecuting office
Eastern District of Texas
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Elder FraudElder Justice Legislation And InitiativesLaw Enforcement CollaborationMoney Laundering / Money MulesRomance ScamTransnational Crime / International CooperationUnlicensed Money Transmitting Business

Primary source

Every fact above is drawn from the Department of Justice's own announcement — a public-domain government record.

Read the original DOJ release →

This is a research and reference page compiled from public DOJ announcements, not legal advice. Details reflect the government's statements as of its release date and may not capture later developments such as appeals, dismissals, or overturned convictions. Defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.